Skip to content

BBH Chapter 25 — Niphal Weak Verbs (נִפְעַל)

Apply the Niphal stem patterns to weak root classes: I-guttural (compensatory lengthening instead of dagesh forte), I-נ (double assimilation), III-ה (characteristic III-ה endings across all conjugations), hollow, and geminate roots. The goal is to recognize a Niphal form even when the diagnostic nun is obscured by root behavior, and to distinguish Niphal from Qal in ambiguous cases.

Resource Link
Exercises View exercises →
Flashcard Decks View decks →

Basics of Biblical Hebrew, Pratico & Van Pelt Builds on Ch24 (Niphal Strong Verbs). Weak forms only — semantic functions not repeated.

Scope: This chapter extends the Niphal paradigm to five weak-root classes. Each class modifies the strong pattern in a predictable, phonologically motivated way. Functions (Passive / Reflexive / Reciprocal / Simple Action / Middle-Tolerative) were covered in Ch24 and are not repeated here.


1. The Eight Weak Classes — Overview

Class Label Representative roots What changes Affected conjugations
III-א (Lamed-Aleph) lamed-aleph מָצָא, יָרֵא Final א quiesces; preceding vowel may lengthen Perfect 3fs, imperfect, participle
III-ה (Lamed-He) lamed-he גָּלָה, רָאָה Final ה is a vowel letter; endings contract All conjugations
III-ח/ע (Lamed-Guttural) lamed-guttural שָׁמַע, שָׁלַח Patach furtive before word-final ח/ע; tsere shifts to patach in short forms Perfect 3ms/3fs/3cp, imperfect, wayyiqtol, imperative, participle ms
I-guttural (Pe-Guttural) pe-guttural עָמַד, אָמַר Guttural rejects dagesh forte; compensatory lengthening Imperfect, wayyiqtol, imperative, infinitives
I-נ (Pe-Nun) pe-nun נָגַשׁ, נָצַל Root's own נ assimilates into R2 All conjugations
I-י (Pe-Yod) pe-yod יָלַד, יָדַע Splits into two sub-patterns: נוֹ- vs. יִוָּ- All conjugations
Biconsonantal (II-י/ו) biconsonantal קוּם, שׁוּב נָ prefix (qamets) in perfect/participle; dagesh in R1 elsewhere All conjugations
Geminate (II=III, Ayin-Doubled) geminate סָבַב, תָּמַם R2 = R3; doubled consonant may collapse; נָ prefix in perfect/participle (like Biconsonantal) All conjugations

Key principle: None of these classes requires learning a new stem. Every change follows from a standard phonological rule — quiescence, compensatory lengthening, patach furtive, or assimilation — applied to the strong Niphal pattern. Learn the rule; the form follows.


2. III-א (Lamed-Aleph) Verbs

Pattern

The final א of the root quiesces (becomes silent) in word-final position. The vowel that would stand under it is drawn to the preceding syllable instead, often producing a final long vowel. The Niphal prefix and dagesh patterns are otherwise identical to the strong root.

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נִמְצָא — looks like the strong root except the final vowel extends under א (which is silent) - Imperfect/Wayyiqtol: יִמָּצֵא — the final syllable ends in silent א after tsere; the form looks like a strong root - Participle ms: נִמְצָא — identical in pointing to the perfect 3ms; context distinguishes them

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: מצא.

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נִמְצָא יִמָּצֵא וַיִּמָּצֵא וְנִמְצָא 2ms: הִמָּצֵא הִמָּצֵא נִמְצוֹא ms: נִמְצָא
3fs / fs נִמְצְאָה תִּמָּצֵא וַתִּמָּצֵא וְנִמְצְאָה 2fs: הִמָּֽצְאִי fs: נִמְצָאָה
2ms / mp נִמְצֵ֫אתָ תִּמָּצֵא וַתִּמָּצֵא וְנִמְצֵ֫אתָ 2mp: הִמָּֽצְאוּ mp: נִמְצָאִים
2fs / fp נִמְצֵאת תִּמָּֽצְאִי וַתִּמָּֽצְאִי וְנִמְצֵאת 2fp: הִמָּצֶ֫אנָה fp: נִמְצָאוֹת
1cs נִמְצֵ֫אתִי אֶמָּצֵא וָאֶמָּצֵא וְנִמְצֵ֫אתִי
3cp נִמְצְאוּ יִמָּֽצְאוּ וַיִּמָּֽצְאוּ וְנִמְצְאוּ
2mp נִמְצֵאתֶם תִּמָּֽצְאוּ וַתִּמָּֽצְאוּ וְנִמְצֵאתֶם
2fp נִמְצֵאתֶן תִּמָּצֶ֫אנָה וַתִּמָּצֶ֫אנָה וְנִמְצֵאתֶן
1cp נִמְצֵ֫אנוּ נִמָּצֵא וַנִּמָּצֵא וְנִמְצֵ֫אנוּ

Key Corpus Examples

  • נִמְצָא (Gen 44:9) — "whoever is found [with the cup]" — perfect 3ms; the silent א is invisible but the quiescence is real
  • וַיִּמָּצֵא (Gen 44:12) — "and it was found" — wayyiqtol; classic passive in the Joseph narrative
  • הִמָּצֵא יִמָּצֵא (Exo 22:3) — inf. absolute + imperfect; emphatic construction stressing the certainty of discovery
  • אִם יִמָּצֵא (Gen 44:10) — imperfect 3ms; conditional clause in the brothers' oath

3. III-ה (Lamed-He) Verbs

Pattern

The final ה of these roots is not a true consonant but a vowel letter (mater lectionis). The Niphal of III-ה verbs shows distinctive contracted endings throughout the paradigm. The main patterns to learn:

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נִגְלָה — final ָה (qamets + he) instead of the strong root's final consonant - Imperfect 3ms: יִגָּלֶה — final seghol + he instead of tsere; the dagesh pattern is the same as the strong root - Wayyiqtol 3ms: וַיִּגָּל — the ה is apocopated (dropped) in this form; compare וַיִּקָּטֵל → וַיִּגָּל - Inf. Construct: הִגָּלוֹת — the ת is added to the base (cf. Qal inf. construct of III-ה roots) - Participle ms: נִגְלֶה — final seghol + he

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: בנה (Niphal: נִבְנָה).

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נִבְנָה יִבָּנֶה וַיִּבָּן וְנִבְנָה 2ms: הִבָּנֵה הִבָּנוֹת נִבְנֹה ms: נִבְנֶה
3fs / fs נִבְנְתָה תִּבָּנֶה וַתִּבָּנֶה וְנִבְנְתָה 2fs: הִבָּנִי fs: נִבְנָה
2ms / mp נִבְנֵ֫יתָ תִּבָּנֶה וַתִּבָּנֶה וְנִבְנֵ֫יתָ 2mp: הִבָּנוּ mp: נִבְנִים
2fs / fp נִבְנֵית תִּבָּנִי וַתִּבָּנִי וְנִבְנֵית 2fp: הִבָּנֶ֫ינָה fp: נִבְנוֹת
1cs נִבְנֵ֫יתִי אֶבָּנֶה וָאֶבָּנֶה וְנִבְנֵ֫יתִי
3cp נִבְנוּ יִבָּנוּ וַיִּבָּנוּ וְנִבְנוּ
2mp נִבְנֵיתֶם תִּבָּנֶ֫ינָה וַתִּבָּנֶ֫ינָה וְנִבְנֵיתֶם
2fp נִבְנֵיתֶן תִּבָּנוּ וַתִּבָּנוּ וְנִבְנֵיתֶן
1cp נִבְנֵ֫ינוּ נִבָּנֶה וַנִּבָּנֶה וְנִבְנֵ֫ינוּ

Note: The Wayyiqtol 3ms (וַיִּבָּן) apocopates the final ה. This is the distinctive marker of III-ה verbs in the Wayyiqtol.

Note on רָאָה: Where גָּלָה/בָּנָה shows יִגָּלֶה, רָאָה shows יֵרָאֶה (compensatory lengthening before ר). Both are III-ה; the difference is the I-position consonant.

Key Corpus Examples

  • וַיֵּרָא יְהוָה אֶל־אַבְרָם (Gen 12:7) — wayyiqtol 3ms; apocopated form — the LORD appeared to Abram
  • תֵרָאֶה הַיַּבָּשָׁה (Gen 1:9) — imperfect/jussive 3fs; let the dry land appear (tolerative)
  • נִגְלָה כְּבוֹד יְהוָה (Isa 40:5) — perfect 3ms; the glory of the LORD will be revealed
  • לְהֵרָאוֹת אֶת־פְּנֵי (Exo 34:24) — inf. construct; to appear before the LORD three times a year

4. I-guttural (Pe-Guttural) Verbs

Pattern

Guttural consonants (א ה ח ע) cannot receive dagesh forte. In the conjugations where the Niphal normally doubles R1 (imperfect, wayyiqtol, imperative, infinitives), the dagesh is rejected and the preceding vowel is lengthened compensatorily instead: hiriqtsere (יִ → יֵ / הִ → הֵ).

In the perfect, the guttural takes a composite shewa (hateph) instead of a simple vocal shewa, and the prefix vowel often shifts to seghol (נִ → נֶ).

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נֶאֱמַר / נֶעֱמַד — seghol under נ + composite shewa under the guttural - Imperfect 3ms: יֵאָמֵר / יֵעָמֵד — tsere under the prefix (not hiriq); no dagesh in R1 - Wayyiqtol 3ms: וַיֵּאָמֵר — same lengthening; the tsere is the marker - Imperative/Inf. Construct: הֵאָמֵר / הֵעָמֵד — tsere under ה (not hiriq); no dagesh in R1

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: עזב (Niphal: נֶעֱזַב).

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נֶעֱזַב יֵעָזֵב וַיֵּעָזֵב וְנֶעֱזַב 2ms: הֵעָזֵב הֵעָזֵב נַעֲזוֹב ms: נֶעֱזָב
3fs / fs נֶעֶזְבָה תֵּעָזֵב וַתֵּעָזֵב וְנֶעֶזְבָה 2fs: הֵעָֽזְבִי הֵעָזוֹב fs: נֶעֱזֶ֫בֶת
2ms / mp נֶעֱזַ֫בְתָּ תֵּעָזֵב וַתֵּעָזֵב וְנֶעֱזַ֫בְתָּ 2mp: הֵעָֽזְבוּ mp: נֶעֱזָבִים
2fs / fp נֶעֱזַבְתְּ תֵּעָֽזְבִי וַתֵּעָֽזְבִי וְנֶעֱזַבְתְּ 2fp: הֵעָזַ֫בְנָה fp: נֶעֱזָבוֹת
1cs נֶעֱזַ֫בְתִּי אֵעָזֵב וָאֵעָזֵב וְנֶעֱזַ֫בְתִּי
3cp נֶעֶזְבוּ יֵעָֽזְבוּ וַיֵּעָֽזְבוּ וְנֶעֶזְבוּ
2mp נֶעֱזַבְתֶּם תֵּעָזַ֫בְנָה וַתֵּעָזַ֫בְנָה וְנֶעֱזַבְתֶּם
2fp נֶעֱזַבְתֶּן תֵּעָֽזְבוּ וַתֵּעָֽזְבוּ וְנֶעֱזַבְתֶּן
1cp נֶעֱזַ֫בְנוּ נֵעָזֵב וַנֵּעָזֵב וְנֶעֱזַ֫בְנוּ

Key Corpus Examples

  • וַיֵּאָמֵר (Gen 10:9; etc.) — wayyiqtol 3ms of אָמַר; "it was said" — extremely frequent
  • נֶאֱמַר (various legal texts) — perfect; "it has been said / it is written"
  • הֵעָמֵד (cf. Exo 9:16) — imperative; "set yourself / be made to stand"
  • נֶאֱסְפוּ (Gen 49:1) — perfect 3cp of אָסַף (I-א); "gathered together" — א rejects dagesh, seghol under נ

5. I-נ (Pe-Nun) Verbs

Pattern

In I-נ roots, the root's own first radical (נ) assimilates into R2 in the same conjugations where it would assimilate in a regular verb. Because the Niphal also has a נ prefix that assimilates in the imperfect/wayyiqtol/imperative/infinitives, both assimilations converge in those forms:

  • Perfect: The Niphal נִ prefix stays (no assimilation in the perfect), but the root's own R1 (נ) also assimilates into R2 → R2 shows dagesh. The form appears to have only two root letters visible.
  • Imperfect/Wayyiqtol/Imperative/Inf.: The Niphal prefix נ and the root's נ both assimilate into R2 → still a single dagesh in R2.

The result: I-נ Niphal forms consistently show dagesh forte in R2, with R1 (נ) invisible throughout the paradigm.

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נִגַּשׁ (from נָגַשׁ) — only two consonants visible after the נִ prefix; dagesh in R2 - Imperfect 3ms: יִגַּשׁ — looks like a Qal imperfect; the dagesh in R2 is the Niphal signal - Wayyiqtol 3ms: וַיִּגַּשׁ — same; compare to strong וַיִּקָּטֵל (dagesh in R1) vs. I-נ (dagesh in R2) - Participle ms: נִגָּשׁ — qamets under R2 (like the strong root participle, but only two consonants visible)

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: נצל (Niphal: נִצַּל).

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נִצַּל יִנָּצֵל וַיִּנָּצֵל וְנִצַּל 2ms: הִנָּצֵל הִנָּצֵל הִנָּצֵל ms: נִצָּל
3fs / fs נִצְּלָה תִּנָּצֵל וַתִּנָּצֵל וְנִצְּלָה 2fs: הִנָּֽצְלִי נִצּוֹל fs: נִצֶּ֫לֶת
2ms / mp נִצַּ֫לְתָּ תִּנָּצֵל וַתִּנָּצֵל וְנִצַּ֫לְתָּ 2mp: הִנָּֽצְלוּ mp: נִצָּלִים
2fs / fp נִצַּלְתְּ תִּנָּֽצְלִי וַתִּנָּֽצְלִי וְנִצַּלְתְּ 2fp: הִנָּצַ֫לְנָה fp: נִצָּלוֹת
1cs נִצַּ֫לְתִּי אֶנָּצֵל וָאֶנָּצֵל וְנִצַּ֫לְתִּי
3cp נִצְּלוּ יִנָּֽצְלוּ וַיִּנָּֽצְלוּ וְנִצְּלוּ
2mp נִצַּלְתֶּם תִּנָּצַ֫לְנָה וַתִּנָּצַ֫לְנָה וְנִצַּלְתֶּם
2fp נִצַּלְתֶּן תִּנָּֽצְלוּ וַתִּנָּֽצְלוּ וְנִצַּלְתֶּן
1cp נִצַּ֫לְנוּ נִנָּצֵל וַנִּנָּצֵל וְנִצַּ֫לְנוּ

Key Corpus Examples

  • וַיִּגַּשׁ יְהוּדָה (Gen 44:18) — wayyiqtol 3ms of נָגַשׁ; "Judah drew near" — one of the most frequent Niphal wayyiqtol forms in Genesis
  • וַיִּנָּצֵל יַעֲקֹב (Gen 32:31) — wayyiqtol 3ms of נָצַל; "Jacob was delivered" — after the wrestling at Peniel
  • הִנָּצֵל (Prov 6:3) — imperative; "deliver yourself!" — reflexive force of the Niphal clear
  • נִצַּלְתֶּם (Exo 12:27) — perfect 2mp of נָצַל; "you were passed over / spared"

6. I-י (Pe-Yod) Verbs

Pattern

I-י verbs show the most complex split of the five classes, creating two distinct sub-paradigms within the same stem:

Conjugations Prefix Why
Perfect, Weqatal, Participle נוֹ- נִ + י contracts → נוֹ ()
Imperfect, Wayyiqtol, Imperative, Inf. יִוָּ- / הִוָּ- Both the Niphal's נ and the root's י assimilate into R2

This is the only Niphal weak class with a split inside the paradigm. The נוֹ- forms can resemble Qal active participles of I-י roots — vowel under R2 distinguishes them (tsere = Qal participle; patah/qamets = Niphal perfect/participle).

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נוֹלַד / נוֹדַע — the נוֹ prefix is the immediate marker; patah under R2 (not tsere) - Imperfect 3ms: יִוָּלֵד / יִוָּדַע — יִוָּ cluster is distinctive; tsere or patah under R2 reflects the root's vowel class - Wayyiqtol 3ms: וַיִּוָּלֵד — the וַיִּוָּ cluster is visually unique and highly frequent in genealogies - Participle ms: נוֹלָד / נוֹדָע — נוֹ prefix + qamets under R2 (cf. perfect: patah under R2)

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: ישב (Niphal: נוֹשַׁב).

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נוֹשַׁב יִוָּשֵׁב וַיִּוָּשֵׁב וְנוֹשַׁב 2ms: הִוָּשֵׁב הִוָּשֵׁב ms: נוֹשַׁב
3fs / fs נוֹשְׁבָה תִּוָּשֵׁב וַתִּוָּשֵׁב וְנוֹשְׁבָה 2fs: הִוָּֽשְׁבִי fs: נוֹשֶׁ֫בֶת
2ms / mp נוֹשַׁ֫בְתָּ תִּוָּשֵׁב וַתִּוָּשֵׁב וְנוֹשַׁ֫בְתָּ 2mp: הִוָּֽשְׁבוּ mp: נוֹשָׁבִים
2fs / fp נוֹשַׁבְתְּ תִּוָּֽשְׁבִי וַתִּוָּֽשְׁבִי וְנוֹשַׁבְתְּ 2fp: הִוָּשַׁ֫בְנָה fp: נוֹשָׁבוֹת
1cs נוֹשַׁ֫בְתִּי אִוָּשֵׁב וָאִוָּשֵׁב וְנוֹשַׁ֫בְתִּי
3cp נוֹשְׁבוּ יִוָּֽשְׁבוּ וַיִּוָּֽשְׁבוּ וְנוֹשְׁבוּ נוֹשָׁב
2mp נוֹשַׁבְתֶּם תִּוָּשַׁ֫בְנָה וַתִּוָּשַׁ֫בְנָה וְנוֹשַׁבְתֶּם
2fp נוֹשַׁבְתֶּן תִּוָּֽשְׁבוּ וַתִּוָּֽשְׁבוּ וְנוֹשַׁבְתֶּן
1cp נוֹשַׁ֫בְנוּ נִוָּשֵׁב וַנִּוָּשֵׁב וְנוֹשַׁ֫בְנוּ

Note: The Infinitive Absolute is not securely attested in the Niphal for I-י verbs. An alternative Inf. Cs. form (נוֹשָׁב) appears in the source paradigm at the 3cp row.

Key Corpus Examples

  • כִּי נוֹלַד לוֹ (Gen 21:3) — perfect 3ms; "for a son has been born to him" — birth announcement formula
  • וַיִּוָּלֵד לַחֲנוֹךְ (Gen 4:18) — wayyiqtol 3ms; antediluvian genealogical chain — the וַיִּוָּ cluster appears scores of times in genealogies
  • יִוָּדַע יֹוסֵף (Gen 45:1) — imperfect/wayyiqtol context; "Joseph made himself known"
  • נוֹדָע בִּיהוּדָה אֱלֹהִים (Psa 76:2) — participle ms; "God is known in Judah"
  • בֶּן מֵאָה שָׁנָה בְּהִוָּלֶד לוֹ יִצְחָק (Gen 21:5) — inf. construct; "when Isaac was born to him"

7. III-ח/ע (Lamed-Guttural) Verbs

Pattern

Gutturals (ח and ע) at R3 prefer a-class vowels. In the Niphal, this produces two effects:

  1. Patach furtive (פַּתַח גְּנוּבָה) appears before word-final ח/ע in open syllables — inserted between the preceding vowel and the guttural, and pronounced before it (הִשָּׁמַע = "hish-SHA-ma").
  2. In shorter forms (wayyiqtol 3ms, imperative 2ms), the Niphal characteristic tsere (between R2 and R3) shifts to patach because the guttural prefers an a-class vowel.

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נִשְׁמַע — patach furtive beneath final ע; the form looks like the strong root except the furtive patach is visible - Imperfect 3ms: יִשָּׁמַע — patach under R3 (not tsere as in the strong root יִקָּטֵל); dagesh forte in R1 is unchanged - Wayyiqtol 3ms: וַיִּשָּׁמַע — patach before final ח/ע; no patach furtive (form already short) - Participle ms: נִשְׁמָע — patach furtive before final ח/ע in the ms form

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: שמע.

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נִשְׁמַע יִשָּׁמַע וַיִּשָּׁמַע וְנִשְׁמַע 2ms: הִשָּׁמַע הִשָּׁמַע נִשְׁמֹעַ ms: נִשְׁמָע
3fs / fs נִשְׁמְעָה תִּשָּׁמַע וַתִּשָּׁמַע וְנִשְׁמְעָה 2fs: הִשָּׁמְעִי fs: נִשְׁמַ֫עַת
2ms / mp נִשְׁמַ֫עְתָּ תִּשָּׁמַע וַתִּשָּׁמַע וְנִשְׁמַ֫עְתָּ 2mp: הִשָּׁמְעוּ mp: נִשְׁמָעִים
2fs / fp נִשְׁמַעְתְּ תִּשָּׁמְעִי וַתִּשָּׁמְעִי וְנִשְׁמַעְתְּ 2fp: הִשָּׁמַ֫עְנָה fp: נִשְׁמָעוֹת
1cs נִשְׁמַ֫עְתִּי אֶשָּׁמַע וָאֶשָּׁמַע וְנִשְׁמַ֫עְתִּי
3cp נִשְׁמְעוּ יִשָּׁמְעוּ וַיִּשָּׁמְעוּ וְנִשְׁמְעוּ
2mp נִשְׁמַעְתֶּם תִּשָּׁמַ֫עְנָה וַתִּשָּׁמַ֫עְנָה וְנִשְׁמַעְתֶּם
2fp נִשְׁמַעְתֶּן תִּשָּׁמְעוּ וַתִּשָּׁמְעוּ וְנִשְׁמַעְתֶּן
1cp נִשְׁמַ֫עְנוּ נִשָּׁמַע וַנִּשָּׁמַע וְנִשְׁמַ֫עְנוּ

Key Corpus Examples

  • נִשְׁמַע (Est 1:20) — "the decree will be heard throughout the kingdom" — perfect 3ms; patach furtive before final ע
  • יִשָּׁמַע (Exo 28:35) — "its sound shall be heard when he goes into the Holy Place" — imperfect 3ms; patach before ע (not tsere)
  • וַיִּשָּׁמַע (Gen 45:2) — "the sound was heard in Pharaoh's house" — wayyiqtol 3ms; patach before ע, no furtive
  • נִשְׁמָע (Ecc 12:13) — "all has been heard" — participle ms; patach furtive signals the lamed-guttural

8. Biconsonantal (II-י/ו) Verbs

Pattern

Biconsonantal (Hollow) roots have only two true root consonants with a medial long vowel. In the Niphal, the hallmark pattern is the נָ prefix (qamets under נ) in the perfect and participle — in contrast to the normal נִ (hiriq) of the strong root. This single marker is the key to recognizing the biconsonantal Niphal.

In the imperfect, wayyiqtol, and imperative, the Niphal's prefix נ assimilates into R1 (dagesh forte in R1), as in all Niphal imperfects; the contracted root (R1 + medial vowel + R2) follows.

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נָקוֹם / נָכוֹן — qamets under נ; the biconsonantal root's medial vowel letter (ו/י) visible - Imperfect 3ms: יִקּוֹם — dagesh forte in R1 (Niphal assimilation) + contracted root; can resemble Qal — context is essential - Participle ms: נָקוּם / נָכוּן — qamets under נ; same prefix as perfect 3ms

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: קום.

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נָקוֹם יִקּוֹם וַיִּקּוֹם וְנָקוֹם 2ms: הִקּוֹם הִקּוֹם נָקוֹם ms: נָקוּם
3fs / fs נָקוֹמָה תִּקּוֹם וַתִּקּוֹם וְנָקוֹמָה 2fs: הִקּוּמִי fs: נָקוּמָה
2ms / mp נָקַ֫מְתָּ תִּקּוֹם וַתִּקּוֹם וְנָקַ֫מְתָּ 2mp: הִקּוּמוּ mp: נָקוּמִים
2fs / fp נָקַמְתְּ תִּקּוּמִי וַתִּקּוּמִי וְנָקַמְתְּ 2fp: הִקּוֹ֫מְנָה fp: נָקוּמוֹת
1cs נָקַ֫מְתִּי אֶקּוֹם וָאֶקּוֹם וְנָקַ֫מְתִּי
3cp נָקוֹמוּ יִקּוּמוּ וַיִּקּוּמוּ וְנָקוֹמוּ
2mp נָקַמְתֶּם תִּקּוּמוּ וַתִּקּוּמוּ וְנָקַמְתֶּם
2fp נָקַמְתֶּן תִּקּוֹ֫מְנָה וַתִּקּוֹ֫מְנָה וְנָקַמְתֶּן
1cp נָקַ֫מְנוּ נִקּוֹם וַנִּקּוֹם וְנָקַ֫מְנוּ

Key Corpus Examples

  • נָכוֹן (Gen 41:32) — "the thing is fixed by God" — perfect 3ms from כּוּן; qamets under נ is the diagnostic marker
  • נָכוֹן (Psa 51:12) — "restore to me a steadfast spirit" — same root, same pattern; extremely common in wisdom and psalmic poetry
  • נָכוֹן (Psa 57:8) — "my heart is steadfast, O God" — participial use of נָכוֹן from כּוּן
  • יִכּוֹן (Psa 93:2) — "your throne is established from of old" — imperfect 3ms; dagesh in כּ (R1) marks it as Niphal

9. Geminate (Ayin-Doubled, II=III) Verbs

Pattern

Geminate roots have R2 = R3 (e.g., סָבַב: ס-ב-ב; תָּמַם: ת-מ-מ). The doubled consonant can appear as dagesh forte in the doubled R2/R3 (the "heavy" form), or it may collapse with a long compensatory vowel (the "light" form). In the Niphal, the most important pattern is the perfect/participle, which shows the distinctive נָ prefix (qamets under נ) — the same marker as the Biconsonantal class.

Diagnostic markers: - Perfect 3ms: נָסַב — qamets under נָ; resembles Biconsonantal (e.g., נָכוֹן from כּוּן), but the root has three consonants with R2=R3 instead of a hollow vowel letter - Imperfect 3ms: יִסֹּב — dagesh forte in R2/R3 (ב written once but doubled) + holem - Wayyiqtol 3ms: וַיִּסֹּב — וַיִּ prefix + dagesh in R2/R3 - Participle ms: נָסַב — identical to perfect 3ms; context is the only distinguisher (parallels Biconsonantal and III-א ambiguity)

Full Paradigm

Paradigm verb: סבב.

PGN Perfect Imperfect Wayyiqtol Weqatal Imperative Inf. Cs. Inf. Ab. Participle
3ms / ms נָסַב יִסֹּב וַיִּסֹּב וְנָסַב 2ms: הִסֹּב הִסֹּב נִסֹּב ms: נָסַב
3fs / fs נָסַ֫בָּה תִּסֹּב וַתִּסֹּב וְנָסַ֫בָּה 2fs: הִסֹּ֫בִּי fs: נְסֻבָּה
2ms / mp נְסַבּ֫וֹתָ תִּסֹּב וַתִּסֹּב וְנְסַבּ֫וֹתָ 2mp: הִסֹּ֫בּוּ mp: נְסַבִּים
2fs / fp נְסַבּוֹת תִּסֹּ֫בִּי וַתִּסֹּ֫בִּי וְנְסַבּוֹת 2fp: הִסֹּבְנָה fp: נְסַבּוֹת
1cs נְסַבּ֫וֹתִי אֶסֹּב וָאֶסֹּב וְנְסַבּ֫וֹתִי
3cp נָסַ֫בּוּ יִסֹּ֫בּוּ וַיִּסֹּ֫בּוּ וְנָסַ֫בּוּ
2mp נְסַבּוֹתֶם תִּסֹּ֫בּוּ וַתִּסֹּ֫בּוּ וְנְסַבּוֹתֶם
2fp נְסַבּוֹתֶן תִּסֹּבְנָה וַתִּסֹּבְנָה וְנְסַבּוֹתֶן
1cp נְסַבּ֫וֹנוּ נִסֹּב וַנִּסֹּב וְנְסַבּ֫וֹנוּ

Key Corpus Examples

  • נָסַב (Josh 15:3) — "the border went around toward Azmon" — perfect 3ms; qamets under נָ is the primary diagnostic
  • וַיִּסֹּב (1 Sam 7:16) — "and he went on circuit" — wayyiqtol 3ms; Samuel's annual judicial circuit; dagesh in ב marks the doubled root
  • הִסֹּב (2 Sam 18:30) — "turn aside, stand here" — imperative 2ms; הִ prefix + dagesh in ב
  • תִּתַּמָּה (†) — theoretically: "it shall be completed" — imperfect 3fs from תָּמַם; dagesh in מ marks R2=R3
  • נָסַבּוּ (Josh 6:3) — "march around the city" — perfect 3cp; dagesh visible in ב with 3cp suffix

10. High-Frequency Weak Niphal Lemmas

Torah-frequency counts (Genesis–Deuteronomy) for the most common Niphal lemmas belonging to one of the eight weak classes.

Root Class Torah Niphal (×) Niphal Gloss
שָׁבַע I-י 61 swear an oath (reflexive)
רָאָה III-ה 49 appear, be seen (middle)
עָשָׂה III-ה 36 be done, be made (passive)
אָכַל I-guttural (I-א) 34 be eaten (passive)
מָצָא III-א 30 be found (passive)
יָלַד I-י 28 be born (passive)
אָסַף I-guttural (I-א) 24 be gathered, die (passive)
נָצַל I-נ 22 be rescued, delivered (passive)
יָדַע I-י 20 be known, become known (passive/middle)
גָּלָה III-ה 18 be revealed, go into exile (passive)
אָמַר I-guttural (I-א) 17 be said (passive)
שָׁמַע III-ח/ע 16 be heard, be proclaimed (passive)
נָגַשׁ I-נ 14 draw near, approach (reflexive)
יָרֵא III-א 12 be feared, fearsome (passive/middle)
עָמַד I-guttural (I-ע) 10 take a stand, be stationed (reflexive)
כּוּן Biconsonantal 9 be established, be firm (stative)
חָבָא III-א 8 hide oneself (reflexive)
שָׁלַח III-ח/ע 7 be sent, be let go (passive)
סָבַב Geminate 6 be surrounded, go around (reflexive/passive)
תָּמַם Geminate 5 be finished, be complete (stative/passive)

11. Practice

Resource Description
Morphology Flashcard Deck 40 cards across all eight weak classes. Import the .txt file into Anki for spaced-repetition drilling.
Passage Exercise "Spot the Niphal" — parsing exercise from Gen 3, 6, and 21 with weak-root emphasis. Includes weak-class identification column.
Weak-Form Identification Drill 40 forms across all eight classes in two parts: by class, then mixed.